ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES@#To investigate the relationship between the perpetrator's sex, victim's position and slashing location as well as anthropometric parameters on distance and space required for slashing, to provide the theoretical basis for the judgment of whether the crime scene was consistent with the criminal activity space.@*METHODS@#The kinematics data of 12 male and 12 female subjects slashing the neck of standing and supine mannequins as well as the chest of the standing mannequins with a kitchen knife were obtained by using a 3D motion capture system. The relationship between the perpetrator's sex-victim's position, the perpetrator's sex-slashing location, and anthropometric parameters and the distance and space required for the slashing were analyzed by two-factor repeated measures ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis respectively.@*RESULTS@#Compared with slashing the neck of supine mannequins, the distance (L) and normalized L (l) of slashing the neck of standing mannequins were greater, while vertical distance (LVR) and normalized LVR (lVR) of the knife side were smaller. Compared with slashing the neck of standing mannequins, the L and l slashing the chest of standing mannequins were greater, while LVR and lVR were smaller. Horizontal distance (LHR) and normalized LHR (lHR) of the knife side in males were greater than that in females. Height and arm length were positively correlated with L, LHR, and LVR when striking the standing mannequins.@*CONCLUSIONS@#When slashing the neck of supine or standing victims, the slashing distance is shorter and the slashing height is greater. Furthermore, the distance and space required for slashing are correlate with anthropometric parameters.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Motion Capture , Crime , Biomechanical PhenomenaABSTRACT
Objective To compare the differences in gait characteristics and stability of women walking with or without sports bra. Methods Twelve women with C cup breast were required to walk on the treadmill (at the speed of 6 km/h) with and without sports bras, respectively. Their gait parameters were collected by using Qualisys Track Manager high-speed infrared motion capture system. Results Compared with the bare-breasted condition, the maximum and minimum angles of the upper trunk were significantly smaller when subjects wearing the sports bra, the range of trunk flexion angles and trunk torsion angles were also relatively smaller, and the standard deviation of hip flexion angles during 10 gait cycles was obviously smaller. However, no differences were found in stride frequency between two breast support conditions. Conclusions Different breast support conditions have a significant influence on the upper trunk angle, trunk flexion angle and trunk torsion angle. Walking without bra will increase the range of trunk angle and deteriorate the walking stability. The stride frequencies under different breast support conditions have individual differences.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the differences in gait characteristics and stability of women walking with or without sports bra.Methods Twelve women with C cup breast were required to walk on the treadmill (at the speed of 6 krn/h) with and without sports bras,respectively.Their gait parameters were collected by using Qualisys Track Manager high-speed infrared motion capture system.Results Compared with the bare-breasted condition,the maximum and minimum angles of the upper trunk were significantly smaller when subjects wearing the sports bra,the range of trunk flexion angles and trunk torsion angles were also relatively smaller,and the standard deviation of hip flexion angles during 10 gait cycles was obviously smaller.However,no differences were found in stride frequency between two breast support conditions.Conclusions Different breast support conditions have a significant influence on the upper trunk angle,trunk flexion angle and trunk torsion angle.Walking without bra will increase the range of trunk angle and deteriorate the walking stability.The stride frequencies under different breast support conditions have individual differences.